MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019769282 · doi:10.1108/00330330610734764

Reprint of the first issue of Program in 1966

2006· article· en· W2019769282 on OpenAlexaff
R.T. Kimber

Bibliographic record

VenueProgram electronic library and information systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Collection Development and Digital Resources
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReprintOriginalityComputer scienceSnapshot (computer storage)Value (mathematics)Field (mathematics)Data scienceWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceSociologySocial scienceDatabaseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose ‐ The purpose of this piece is to provide a snapshot of the first issue of Program. Design/methodology/approach ‐ This is a reproduction of a historical document, the first issue of the news sheet. Findings ‐ Program was published to assist librarians in learning what was possible in the field of computing use in libraries and to provide a forum for discussion of the problems involved. Originality/value ‐ The piece provides a useful historical document.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2090.091

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgram electronic library and information systemsSame topicLibrary Collection Development and Digital ResourcesFrench-language works237,207