MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019776323 · doi:10.1215/21573698-1303296

Recurrent internal waves in a small lake: Potential ecological consequences for metalimnetic phytoplankton populations

2011· article· en· W2019776323 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology & Oceanography Fluids & Environments · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsEpilimnionThermoclinePhytoplanktonPlanktonOceanographyMixed layerEnvironmental scienceNutrientStratification (seeds)Internal waveDeep chlorophyll maximumHypolimnionEcologyGeologyBiologyDormancyBotanyEutrophication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lay Abstract Wind mixing is one of the main factors controlling the ecology of lakes. Large, deep lakes, as well as small, shallow ones, can develop a seasonal thermal stratification. Because both light and heat come from above, a warm and illuminated surface layer develops above a colder, darker, and heavier bottom water layer under the influence of gravity. Gravity also controls the tendency for the microscopic plants that make up the floating plankton—the phytoplankton, which are a bit heavier than water—to fall from the top layer to the bottom layer, where they die and decompose, releasing the nutrients contained in their bodies. For this reason, the warmer surface layer, or epilimnion, becomes depleted in plant nutrients and the deep layer becomes enriched with nutrients. Specialized phytoplankton can grow at the interface of these two layers, leading to the development of a deep‐chlorophyll maximum in the intermediate layer known as the metalimnion. Strong winds can stir the waters of the upper layer and increase resource availability to the plankton in the upper layer in two ways. First, the mixing can bring nutrients across the metalimnion and up into the epilimnion. Second, the wind increases turbulence in the epilimnion, thereby keeping the phytoplankton suspended in the lighted layer and resuspending cells from the metalimnion. In this study, a particular consequence of wind mixing known as internal waves, which are waves that occur in the metalimnion, was observed in a small lake. These waves are caused by the wind physically pushing the warm surface layer to the downwind side of the lake, where the warm water accumulates and pushes down on the metalimnion, inducing a lakewide tilt in the metalimnion. When the wind relaxes, the waves on the surface of the lake diminish, but larger waves can be induced in the metalimnion as it tries to reestablish its equilibrium with gravity. In much the same way as plucking a guitar string can produce a primary tone as well as several overtones, the oscillation in the metalimnion has more than one frequency. This study links lake physics and ecology by characterizing the different modes of internal waves and examining the potential ecological consequences of each for phytoplankton productivity. Until now, the exploitation of internal waves by specialized phytoplankton has been thought to be important mainly in large, deep lakes. This study highlights the occurrence and ecological importance of both vertically complex internal waves and the dominance of a deep chlorophyll maximum over the entire summer stratification period in a small shallow lake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it