MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019790084 · doi:10.1051/jp4:20030497

Kinetics and products study of the reaction of BrO radicals with gaseous mercury

2003· article· en· W2019790084 on OpenAlex
Farhad Raofie, Parisa A. Ariya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadicalKineticsMercury (programming language)ChemistryChemical kineticsChemical reaction kineticsEnvironmental chemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broreactions of elemental mercury was as a major candidate for near complete depletion of elemental mercury in polar region. The kinetics of the reaction between BrO radicals with gaseous mercury was identified using relative rate method by Gas Chromatography with Mass spectroscopic Detection (GC-MS) at room temperature (298 ± I K) and at atmospheric pressure 760 ± Torr in the N 2 diluent. Propane, DMS and butane were used as reference molecules. The upper and lower limits rate constant for reaction of Hg° with BrO was estimated to be 1.0 × 10 -13 and 1.0 x 10 -15 cm 3 molecules -1 s -1 , respectively. BrO radicals were produced from the photolysis of bromine and dibromomethane in presence of ozone and detected by MS at m / e = 95 or 97. Ozone was produced in a Silent discharged generator. Reaction products were identified using direct mass spectrometer with chemical ionization ion source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it