MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019794869 · doi:10.2118/2009-017

Coupled Flow Simulation in a Deepwater Reservoir: Fault Leakage Analysis

2009· article· en· W2019794869 on OpenAlexaff
L.G. Rodrigues, L.B. Cunha, Rick Chalaturnyk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringReservoir simulationLeakage (economics)Fault (geology)GeologyFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceSeismologyMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Proper modeling of water injection projects in undeveloped deepwater reservoirs is important not only from a recovery factor point of view, but also for environmental protection purposes. Around the world some wells producing from reservoirs under water injection were shut down because of oil leakage to sea. Oil reservoirs with major faults that communicate the reservoir to the seabed are sensitive to water injection projects. Oil companies' common practice is to reuse the produced water and to reinject it into the reservoir. This procedure may cause pressure increase, and also may result in fault slip and communication through the fault from the reservoir to the seabed. Therefore, the flow simulation must consider concepts of shear and effective normal stress to estimate the maximum allowed pressure that generate slip in the fault, and, consequently, leakage to the seafloor. The main objective of this study is to explore the production uncertainties in an undeveloped oil reservoir, under water injection project, with a major internal fault, and the role of geomechanics in the fault reactivation. This study developed a new external iterative computational program applied to complex geological geometry that updates geomechanical information for each cell grid, for each time-step and during each Newton's iteration, to estimate the maximum pressure allowed to safely operate a water injection project without any oil leakage to the sea. This new methodology links two commercial simulators: one that emphasizes flow through porous media aspects, and the other that focuses on the geomechanical behavior. The investigations used triaxial laboratory tests performed in Brazil as support information. Sensitivity analyses of reservoir temperature, injection pressure and well location on the fault were carried out, and a comprehensive stress map and oil leakage variation, associated with flow through the fault, was also obtained. Introduction Exploitation of offshore deepwater reservoirs is a challenge to petroleum companies because of high direct development costs. Project costs may increase tremendously if wells need to be shut in or abandoned. A scenario where well this possibility exists occurs in a reservoir with a major fault that connects the petroleum field to the seafloor. During water injection operations the fluid pressure within the fault may increase to a value that leads to fault slip and hydrocarbon flow through the seabed. The hydrocarbon leakage can result in severe environmental damage and must be avoided. A proper simulation model that enables the evaluation of the maximum injection pressure allowed to impede oil leakage during water injection projects is a necessity. Once a reservoir has been discovered, it is essential to characterize it, as accurately as possible, to determine the most effective way of producing the recoverable oil. Reservoir characterization involves a great amount of data that includes the following: geology, laboratory and production data. Increasingly, geomechanical behavior of the reservoir has become an important aspect of the characterization workflow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207