MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019801395 · doi:10.4043/13023-ms

Terra Nova FPSO: Certification and Technical Integrity Challenges

2001· article· en· W2019801395 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marc Maguire, A.A. Ewida, Corli Leonard

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationTurretEngineeringMarine engineeringSubmarine pipelineProduction (economics)Original equipment manufacturerComputer scienceCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Terra Nova FPSO will be the first floating production installation to operate in the unique and harsh environment of the Grand Banks. In order to avoid the threat of icebergs the FPSO will be able to quickly disconnect from its mooring and to proceed under its own power. The FPSO is therefore required to be certified as both an offshore installation and as a ship. The paper focuses on initiatives implemented to ensure fitness for purpose of the installation within a complex regulatory climate while reducing commercial risk related to the broad geographic and technical spread of development activities. The paper also provides an overview of the Terra Nova development and discusses prominent technical challenges encountered. Introduction The changing nature of today's international oil industry is clearly reflected by the increasing use of floating production systems worldwide. See Table 1 for recent installations classed/certified by Lloyd's Register. Floating Production, Storage and Offloading Installations (FPSOs) present a number of advantages for operators:Hull structures can be straightforward to build, based on conventional shipbuilding technology (with exception of mooring system/turret integration, discussed in more detail below);Expensive offshore work can be kept to a minimum as most of the construction, hook-up and commissioning can be completed onshore;FPSOs are able to handle heavy payloads and equipment may be added incrementally to fit production and reservoir changes;They provide storage and offloading facilities;They are easy to decommission and can be used again in other fields. FPSOs are integrated production systems that are made up from diverse types of components to enable them to produce, store and export crude oil. Performance standards must therefore be able to account for a large number of variables as illustrated in Figure 1 below and which include:Structures/conversionsMooring systemsProcess plantSafety systemsStabilityInspection/maintenance on site The increase in FPSO developments has brought new challenges. A fundamental difficulty with FPSOs has been in achieving accurate technical integration of their various components. Major components of FPSOs and their integrated subsea facilities can be, and often are, manufactured in diverse locations around the world in order to meet contract completion schedules. For example, the Terra Nova FPSO hull was built in South Korea, the process modules in Newfoundland and Europe, the mooring system components in Abu Dhabi, subsea facilities in Europe and North America with the final integration and installation occurring in Newfoundland. Similarly, the design of different elements can take place in a multitude of geographical locations. Careful interface management is key to ensuring technical integration can be achieved during the design phase, in order to prevent costly rework during construction. In addition to the above noted challenges, Terra Nova is the first FPSO designed and built for continuous service in the extreme, ice-prone environment of the Grand Banks of Newfoundland, and area known as Iceberg Alley (see fig. 2). Unique design solutions have been necessary to mitigate the threats posed by this harsh environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207