MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019812509 · doi:10.2118/0708-0067-jpt

SAGD ESP Installations in Canada

2008· article· en· W2019812509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Bybee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsSteam-assisted gravity drainagePetroleumPetroleum industryAsphaltOil reservesCrude oilPetroleum engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringGeologyArchaeologyEnvironmental engineeringGeographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 110103, "Pushing the Boundaries of Artificial-Lift Applications: SAGD ESP Installations in Canada," by F. Gaviria, SPE, Suncor, and R. Santos, SPE, O. Rivas, SPE, and Y. Luy, Schlumberger, originally prepared for the 2007 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, 11–14 November. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The need for high-temperature electrical-submersible-pump (ESP) systems is growing as the oil industry matures. Canada's nonconventional oil reserves are estimated at more than 1 trillion bbl and Suncor's heavy-oil reserves in northern Alberta, Canada, are estimated to have a potential production of 14 billion bbl of crude oil, but the traditional mining methods of recovery do not make them all economically reachable. It is estimated that less than one-fifth of the oil-sands resource is mineable. To deal with this, Suncor has turned to in-situ steam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD) operations as a key part of its plans to increase bitumen supply to its upgraders. Heavy-Oil and Oil-Sands Resources The Canadian petroleum industry is facing dwindling light-crude-oil reserves. However, at the same time, an abundance of established heavy-oil and bitumen deposits remains virtually untapped. According to government statistics, Canada's oil sands contain nearly 175 billion bbl of crude-oil reserves that can be processed with today's technology, thus putting the oil sands second only to Saudi Arabia in crude-oil reserves. It is thought that further technological improvements would allow the recovery of more than 350 billion bbl of bitumen. The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board estimates annual bitumen production in Canada will more than double from 1.1 million B/D (December 2005) to 2.6 million B/D by 2014. Currently, bitumen and synthetic-oil production represents approximately 50% of Canada's total crude output. Three major deposits of bitumen, also called oil sands, are found in the province of Alberta, Canada. These deposits are the Athabasca, Peace River, and Cold Lake oil sands. Despite the technical challenges of producing and processing bitumen, several factors have made investments in oil sands very attractive, given world oil prices. There are no "finding costs" because the oil sands are well delineated, there is ready access to the largest market in the world (the US) by established pipelines, and new technology has reduced operating cost by at least a factor of two. Surface Mining The Athabasca oil-sand deposits occur from the surface to a depth of 750 m true vertical depth. Surface-mining exploitation at depths of up to 100 m historically has been the technique commonly used by several producers in the area. This form of exploitation and development goes back to 1967 when Suncor Energy (Great Canadian Oil Sands then) started the construction of the first oil-sands commercial-mining and -production operation. Since then, more than 3 billion bbl has been produced. This successful story has required the development and improvement of technology such as truck-and-shovel cold-water extraction, slurry pipelining, mechanical separation, and the potential recovery of byproducts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207