MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aneurysmal Bone Cyst Associated with Fibrous Dysplasia

2002· article· en· W2019872725 on OpenAlexaff
Vernon Ho Yuen, David R. Jordan, Maha Jabi, Charles Agbi

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFibrous dysplasiaAneurysmal bone cystOrbit (dynamics)CystLesionAnatomyPathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the clinicopathologic features of a 22-year-old patient with aneurysmal bone cyst and fibrous dysplasia of the orbit. The patient was evaluated clinically with computed tomography of the orbit before surgery. An orbital biopsy specimen was examined histologically with conventional light microscopy. The lesion was treated with combined neurosurgical and orbital intervention. Clinical evaluation revealed axial and inferior displacement of the globe. Computed tomography revealed a cystic mass in the superotemporal left orbit with adjacent bone erosion. "Ground-glass" thickening of the adjacent frontal bone and sphenoid bone was observed. Microscopic examination showed fibrous stroma with giant cells and hemosiderin-laden macrophages with adjacent trabeculae of woven bone and osteoblast cells. A fronto-orbital craniotomy was performed, the cystic cavity was excised, and the hyperostotic bone was debulked. After treatment, the globe position and patient appearance have improved. There has been no sign of recurrence of the aneurysmal bone cyst. Aneurysmal bone cyst should be considered in patients with fibrous dysplasia that has a cystic component, or in patients with fibrous dysplasia who present with sudden expansion of their lesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207