Adsorption of Phosphonic Acid at the TiO<sub>2</sub> Anatase (101) and Rutile (110) Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adsorption of phosphonic acid on the TiO 2 anatase (101) and rutile (110) surfaces have been investigated by means of efficient density-functional-based tight-binding calculations. We studied the geometries and adsorption energies of several adsorption models to achieve clarification of the discrepancy in the experimental finding of a preferred binding state. In this paper we show that there are several adsorption structures likely to be present on the specific TiO 2 surfaces. Those structures have exclusively a bidentate configuration. They have similar adsorption energies but different geometries. For the monodentate complexes, we find a strong trend of the adsorption geometry relaxing toward the bidentate coordination. Also, they have significantly smaller adsorption energies. Furthermore, we extensively demonstrate the reliability of the SCC-DFTB method for this chemical system, which opens the way for studies of adsorption on more complex titania materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".