MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019932395 · doi:10.1089/153685903321538044

Generation of a Monoclonal Antibody that Blocks Epithelial Binding of Unopsonized Particles

2003· article· en· W2019932395 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Florence Tao, Aiyappa Palecanda, Seema Kumar, Lester Kobzik

Bibliographic record

VenueHybridoma and Hybridomics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesHealth CanadaU.S. Public Health Service
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyImmunogenFlow cytometryReceptorMolecular biologyHeLaChemistryCell cultureScavenger receptorA549 cellAntibodyCell biologyBiologyImmunologyCellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alveolar macrophages (AMs) and epithelial cells (ECs) are the first cells in the lung to encounter inhaled environmental particles. The initial interaction between AMs and particles is mediated by specific scavenger receptors, but the nature of the structure(s) on ECs that also bind particles has not been well-described. To characterize the nature of the EC particle receptor, we screened a panel of mouse anti-human EC hybridomas for functional blockade of EC particle binding. This strategy identified a monoclonal antibody (MAb) (EPR1) that blocks binding of titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) particles to the EC line which served as the immunogen (A549), as well as to other EC lines (Beas 2-B, HTB54, HeLa, and MDA-MB-435S). EPR1 demonstrated specific labeling of ECs using immunohistology techniques and its expression could be quantitated by flow cytometry of permeabilized ECs in suspension. MAbs such as EPR1 may prove useful in further analysis of receptors for inhaled particles on lung epithelial cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHybridoma and HybridomicsSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207