MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019936685 · doi:10.3917/riges.294.0066

Commentaire : Le leadership et la confiance

2004· article· fr· W2019936685 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Laurent Lapierre

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméDeux fois dans sa vie, Larry Smith a pris une retraite forcée. La première fois, il avait 31 ans et mettait fin à sa carrière de centre-arrière vedette du club de football Les Alouettes. La deuxième fois, à la suite d’une fusion-acquisition, on l’a mis brusquement à la porte d’une grande entreprise où il œuvrait depuis huit ans, et dont il devait, deux ans plus tard, devenir le président : les nouveaux propriétaires américains rationalisaient les opérations et réduisaient de façon draconienne les effectifs. Les deux fois, Larry Smith a su rebondir, mettant à contribution ses talents de vendeur et de gestionnaire efficace. Après avoir passé deux ans au journal The Gazette dont il était président-éditeur, il annonçait en mars 2004 son retour à la barre du club de football Les Alouettes qu’il avait déjà dirigé plusieurs années auparavant après avoir tenu les rênes de la Ligue canadienne de football. Pour faire face aux imprévus et demeurer toute sa vie un leader, il s’est forgé des points d’ancrage dans des valeurs stables qu’il prend plaisir à partager avec toutes les personnes qui sont intéressées à l’entendre, car Larry Smith est aussi un conférencier recherché.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207