Hydrogenation of natural rubber latex in the presence of OsHCl(CO)(O<sub>2</sub>)(PCy<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogenation is an important method of chemical modification, which improves the physical, chemical, and thermal properties of diene elastomers. Natural rubber latex (NRL) can be quantitatively hydrogenated to provide a strictly alternating ethylene–propylene copolymer using a homogeneous osmium catalyst OsHCl(CO)(O 2 )(PCy 3 ) 2 . A detailed kinetic investigation was carried out by monitoring the amount of hydrogen consumption during the reaction using a gas‐uptake apparatus. The kinetic results of NRL hydrogenation indicated that this system had a second‐order dependence of the hydrogenation rate on hydrogen pressure and then decreased toward a zero‐order dependence for hydrogen pressures above 13.8 bar. The hydrogenation was also observed to be first‐order with respect to catalyst concentration and inverse first‐order on rubber concentration due to impurities present in the rubber latex. Additions of a controlled amount of acid demonstrated a beneficial effect on the hydrogenation rate of NRL. The temperature dependence of the hydrogenation rate was investigated and an apparent activation energy (over the range of 120–160°C) was calculated as 57.6 kJ/mol. Mechanistic aspects of this catalytic process are discussed on the basis of kinetic results. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 640–655, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it