Organization of a gene coding for an oviduct-specific glycoprotein (oviductin) in the hamster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hamster oviductin, a high molecular weight glycoprotein secreted by the oviducts, is believed to participate in fertilization and protection of the tubal epithelium. Expression of the oviductin gene is confined strictly to nonciliated secretory cells of the oviduct and is regulated by hormones. The objective of this study was to characterize the genomic organization and to identify potential regulatory elements implicated in the control of transcription of the oviductin gene. Polymerase chain reaction was performed on hamster genomic DNA, yielding 2.2 kb of the 5' flanking region as well as 13.6 kb of genomic sequence comprising the entire coding sequence of the oviductin gene distributed in 11 exons. Sequencing of the 5' flanking region revealed, among other elements, an almost perfect estrogen-responsive element (GGTCACTGTGACT), an atypical TATA box (TATTAA), and a perfect inverted Sp1 site located between the transcription start site and the atypical TATA box. Primer extension analyses indicated that the hamster oviductin transcript possesses an unusually short 5' untranslated region of only 14 nucleotides. The distinct organization of the hamster oviductin gene in the vicinity of the transcription start site provides an interesting ground for further functional studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".