A‐Frame‐Containing Organometallic Oligomers Constructed From Homo‐ and Heterobimetallic M(μ‐dppm)<sub>2</sub>M′ (M/M′ = Pd, Pt) Building Blocks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The homo‐ and heterodinuclear complexes XM(μ‐dppm)2M′X (M = M′ = Pd, X = Cl 1a; M = M′ = Pd, X = I 1b; M = Pd, M′ = Pt, X = Cl 2a; M = Pd, M′ = Pt, X = I 2b; M = M′ = Pt, X = Cl 3a; M = M′ = Pt, X = I 3b) react with the diisocyanide ligand 1,2‐bis(2‐isocyanophenoxy)ethane (diNC) or the more soluble 1,2‐bis(2‐isocyano‐4‐tert‐butylphenoxy)ethane (tBudiNC) in a 1:1 ratio to provide the thermally stable polymeric materials 4–9 {[XM(μ‐dppm)2M′(μ‐CN‐C6H3R‐2‐OCH2CH2O‐2‐C6H3R‐NC)]X}n (M = M′ = Pd, R = H, X = Cl 4a, I 4b; R = tBu, X = Cl 7; M = M′ = Pt, R = H, X = Cl 5a, I 5b; R = tBu, X = Cl 8; M = Pd, M′ = Pt, R = H, X = Cl 6a, I 6b; R = tBu, X = Cl 9). These A‐frame‐containing materials have been characterized in solution or in the solid state by 31P NMR (MAS) spectroscopy, elemental analysis, MALDI‐TOF, DSC, TGA, IR and T1/NOE [31P NMR spin‐lattice relaxation time and nuclear Overhauser enhancement constant (NOE) measurements]. The IR, Raman [ν(CN) bridging vs. terminal] and NMR spectroscopic data reveal the presence of an A‐frame structure for these new materials. Evidence of an oligomer (including at least two units, determined by T1/NOE experiments) – polymer equilibrium in solution was obtained at room temperature. These polymers are luminescent (phosphorescence) at 77 K in solution and in the solid state, exhibiting broad emission bands in the 500–800 nm range. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2009)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".