Coronary and aortic calcifications in patients new to dialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification has been associated with all cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESRD). Whether vascular calcification is present in persons with advanced chronic kidney disease starting dialysis or develops in patients on dialysis is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of vascular and coronary calcification in patients new to hemodialysis. METHODS: A total of 129 subjects new to dialysis were evaluated using electron beam computed tomography. The primary outcome was the presence and extent of coronary artery, aortic, and valvular calcification. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of subjects had no significant coronary artery calcification (total score </= 30) and 27% had no detectable aortic calcification. Thirty-four percent had coronary artery scores that placed them above the 90th percentile for age and sex. Coronary artery calcification was significantly associated with a history of coronary artery disease and atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASVD) whereas aortic calcification was significantly associated with ASVD. Age (p < 0.0001), pulse pressure (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.009), and a history of smoking (p = 0.026) were independently associated with the extent of coronary artery calcification. Age (p < 0.0001) and pulse pressure (p = 0.0003) were independently associated with the extent of aortic calcification. CONCLUSIONS: A large fraction of patients new to hemodialysis had no evidence of coronary artery or aortic calcification. Coupled with the extensive vascular calcification reported by others in prevalent dialysis patients these findings suggest that dialysis-specific factors contribute to calcific vascular disease in ESRD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".