MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An evaluation of the process and costs associated with targeted lookbacks for HCV and general notification of transfusion recipients

2000· article· en· W2020000679 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jeannie Callum, Peter H. Pinkerton, Ahmed S. Coovadia, Anne E. Thomson, Frankie Dewsbury

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeroconversionBlood transfusionHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Emergency medicineIntensive care medicineMedical emergencySurgeryFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada recommended that hospitals notify patients who received blood between 1978 and May 1990 of the risks of contracting HIV (up to the end of 1985 only) and HCV infection. The commission also recommended that patients should be informed of any transfusion received. STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD: General notifications for HIV and HCV for this period were begun in mid-1994. Notification after discharge of transfusions received after May 1990 was begun in 1997. Targeted HCV lookback was performed from 1995 to 1999. RESULTS: Of 21,016 transfusion recipients from January 1978 to May 1990 identified in the general look-back process and believed still alive, 13,549 (64%) were presumed contacted, by registered mail. The overall contact rate for the ongoing notifications (transfusions after May 1990) cannot be accurately determined, as registered mail was not used and a reply not requested. The total cost for these two processes was CAN$373,481, or $13 per patient believed contacted. Most (56%) of this cost was for the conversion to electronic form of paper transfusion records for the period 1978 through early 1984. In the targeted HCV lookback program 1995 through 1999, 94 percent of 256 recipients of specific components identified as likely to have transmitted HCV either were contacted or had died. Of 84 living recipients, 47 (56%) are HCV positive. The last documented potential seroconversion occurred after a transfusion in November 1991, during the period of first-generation EIA testing. If the targeted HCV lookback had been restricted to transfusions after 1987, as the FDA recommended, we would have failed to identify 39 living patients, of whom 21 are HCV positive. The cost per HCV-positive patient notified in the targeted HCV lookback was CAN $4,174. CONCLUSION: The cost of compliance with the com-mission's recommendations was CAN$569,636. Over 28,000 of 36,773 transfusion recipients were notified or presumed notified, and 272 targeted HCV lookbacks to 256 recipients were performed. Performance of this task required the existence of transfusion records back to 1978, conversion of paper records to electronic form, and adequate secretarial and financial support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.088
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.088
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207