Large Paraesophageal Hernias in Children. Early Experience with Laparoscopic Repair
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Large paraesophageal hernias (LPEH) in children are unusual. The aim of this study is to report the management of LPEH and our initial experience with the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: Since September 2005, four children aged 4-17 years underwent laparoscopic repair of LPEH at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario. Three children had previous fundoplications and two of these had a gastrostomy. Closure of the hiatal defect included crural sutures and prosthetic material, either polytetrafluoroethylene-polypropylene mesh or porcine small intestinal submucosal patch. The charts were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The operative time was 300-540 minutes, with one conversion and two mediastinal pleural tears. Postoperative chest X-ray showed neither mediastinal nor intrapleural air. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Contrast X-ray showed no recurrent hernia and an intact fundoplication. CONCLUSION: LPEH in children is usually a complication of previous fundoplication. Laparoscopic repair is technically demanding but feasible. Adequate crural repair using mesh may reduce the incidence of recurrence. In view of the rarity of LPEH in children, a combined multicenter study is needed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it