Growth and electrochemical properties of Li–Ni–Co–Al oxide films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Li Ni 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 films were grown by pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) in the temperature (Ts) range of 30–500°C and oxygen partial pressure (pO2) maintained in the range of 50–150mTorr. The grown films were characterized using x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy (RS), and electrochemical measurements in order to understand their growth behavior, surface morphology, local chemical structure, and electrochemical properties. XRD, RS, and SEM measurements indicate that the growth and microstructure of PLD LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 films are highly sensitive to the deposition temperature and reactive atmosphere during laser ablation. The fabrication conditions were optimized to produce device quality LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 films for electrochemical applications. The charge-discharge profiles of cells using the PLD grown Li(Ni,Co,Al)O2 films as electrodes demonstrate their applicability in microbatteries. A stable capacity of 98μAh∕cm2μm was obtained in the potential range of 4.2–2.5V for LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 films grown at 450°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".