Dynamic viscous permeability of an open-cell aluminum foam: Computations versus experiments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Is it possible to find a two-dimensional (2D) periodic unit cell representative of the dynamic viscous dissipation properties of a real porous media? This is a challenging question addressed in this paper through a review of tools and methods of experimental and computational micro(poro)mechanics. The combination of advanced experimental imaging and numerical homogenization techniques provides a unique opportunity to understand and assess the limits of two-dimensional models of microstructures, as a potential basis for the engineering prediction of macroscopic properties of acoustical materials. This is illustrated for a real sample of open-cell aluminum foam. The conclusion, based on this analysis, is that the 2D periodic foam model geometry provides a reliable estimate of the dynamic permeability, except in the low frequency range. This is not surprising because in the 2D periodic foam model geometry, ligaments are always perpendicular to the flow direction, thus decreasing artificially the static permeability of the viscous flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it