Different “Weight” of Cardiac and General Adiposity in Predicting Left Ventricle Morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excess adiposity has been widely related to cardiac morphological changes. Nevertheless, the mechanistic link between increased adiposity and left ventricular (LV) morphology is controversial and not completely understood. In this context, several authors have recently debated the different "weight" of BMI as an index of general adiposity vs. the importance of the epicardial fat depot as a marker of local visceral adiposity in obesity-related LV changes. Studies in uncomplicated obesity suggest that the role of BMI in predicting LV abnormalities remains rather doubtful. In contrast, several lines of evidence suggest that cardiac adiposity could play an important part in the development of cardiac modifications. Epicardial fat as an index of cardiac adiposity could have a functional and mechanical role in obesity-related LV abnormalities. Epicardial fat is clinically correlated with LV mass, atrial dimensions, and diastolic function, but a causal effect of epicardial adipose tissue on cardiac chamber modifications remains to be demonstrated. Nevertheless, the close anatomical and functional relationship of epicardial adipose tissue to the adjacent myocardium should readily allow local, paracrine interactions between these tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".