MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020057198 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22034

The theory of parallel channels manifolds (Ladder networks) revisited part 1: Discrete mesoscopic modelling

2014· article· en· W2020057198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscopic physicsChannel (broadcasting)Flow (mathematics)Control volumeFinite volume methodHeat exchangerMomentum (technical analysis)MathematicsStatistical physicsComputer scienceGeometryMechanicsPhysicsMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article proposes a theoretical overview of the distribution of fluid flow through manifolds composed of parallel channels connected through T‐junctions to a distributor and to a collector channel, thus composing a ladder‐like network. Such networks are used in solar heaters, fuel cells, heat exchanger plates, and other engineering devices, one issue being to achieve a nearly uniform distribution. This first part focuses on the discrete mesoscopic momentum and energy balances governing the T‐junctions, with particular attention to the empirical, flow‐rate and geometry dependent, pressure change coefficients. By “mesoscopic”, it is meant that the control volume for the balance equations includes the junction zone and that the local flow‐field in that zone is not described. The existing results and correlations for these coefficients are reviewed, compared, and synthesized. In keeping with the discrete character of the channel network, the overall network relations are compacted as a single non‐linear finite‐difference equation relating the flow‐rates in the different segments of the distributor. This formulation is suitable for convenient numerical resolution even when all the coefficients are allowed to vary with local conditions. The conditions for simplifications, such as assuming constancy of certain coefficients, are carefully investigated. A number of approximate analytical, semi‐explicit or explicit solutions are constructed. In particular, an original view of the structure of these solutions is proposed, relying on an invariance property which is demonstrated, and on the analogy with the classical McCabe‐Thiele construction in chemical engineering. These approximations are compared to exact numerical solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it