MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020071966 · doi:10.1002/stem.5530150709

Early plasma membrane events occurring in ultraviolet-B-induced apoptosis

2009· article· en· W2020071966 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Albanese, N Dainiak

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cells · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyChinese hamster ovary cellCell biologyVesicleMolecular biologyBiophysicsCell cultureBiochemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whereas nonsolar ultraviolet C radiation primarily affects nuclei (i.e., where it is absorbed by nucleic acids) of eukaryotic cells, ultraviolet radiation of long (320-380 nm) wavelengths (ultraviolet A) and intermediate (290-320 nm) wavelengths (ultraviolet B) primarily affects lipid membranes. We have previously demonstrated that ultraviolet B irradiation alters the surface architecture of human B cells and impairs expression of an erythroid growth factor on their surface and on extracellular vesicles. Here, we examined the effects of ultraviolet B irradiation on the capacity of Chinese hamster ovary cells to undergo the process of exfoliation, and on the capacity of Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with flt3/flk2 cDNA to express the cytokine flt3/flk2. Our results indicate that the rate of release of shed vesicles from untransfected Chinese hamster ovary cells is decreased after one to two h, at a time when there is electron microscopic evidence for retention of vesicles at the cell surface. These changes at the cell surface precede all other apparent morphological changes (including DNA condensation in the nucleus, swelling of the mitochondria and appearance of apoptotic bodies). Furthermore, plasma membranes and shed extracellular vesicles from ultraviolet B irradiated Chinese hamster ovary cells that have been transfected with flt3/flk2 cDNA fail to express the protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem CellsSame topicErythrocyte Function and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207