MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020073468 · doi:10.1353/hsp.0.0026

The Ends of the Earth and the “Heroic Age” of Polar Exploration: A Review Essay

2009· review· en· W2020073468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katrin Schultheiss

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorically speaking · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventurePoliticsHistoryContext (archaeology)NationalismNarrativeHEROLiteratureArt historyPolitical scienceArtLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ends of the Earth and the “Heroic Age” of Polar Exploration: A Review Essay Katrin Schultheiss (bio) Along with the American Civil War and the Holocaust, polar exploration is one of the few historical topics that are frequently awarded a stand-alone section in chain bookstores. Typically, those shelves are stocked with a mixture of classic, first-hand accounts of now fabled European and American expeditions from the late 19th and early 20th centuries, biographies of the leaders of the “Heroic Age” of polar exploration, and adventure narratives of more recent journeys to the ends of the Earth, often undertaken “in the footsteps” of earlier giants. These volumes tend to emphasize the literary elements of dramatic characters, settings, and plots over the more academic concerns of social, political, and cultural context; their target audience is both the general reader of popular history and the more specialized polar-adventure “buff.” In the last decade and a half, however, a few academic studies have found a place among the adventure stories. Focusing on such themes as the relationship between nationalism and science, evolving concepts of the natural environment, changing notions of masculinity, and the applicability of theories of empire to the polar regions, these scholarly works undoubtedly reach a far smaller audience. Yet their presence suggests a new academic interest in the history of the Arctic and Antarctic, an interest spurred no doubt by the current cultural and environmental climate that has made these most remote regions of the world relevant in unprecedented ways. Most obviously, the widespread recognition that global warming has altered and will continue to alter the natural, political, and economic character of the polar regions means that studies of the history of the extreme North and South seem more relevant and less esoteric than they did a few decades ago. Simply put, accounts of past polar exploration describe, often in vivid detail, a landscape and way of life (for both animals and humans) that are rapidly vanishing. As Ken McGoogan writes in his recent Race to the Polar Sea, “All through the twentieth century, historians portrayed the Arctic as a harsh world that hardly changed at all . . . . Suddenly, we realize that this picture is obsolete.” More practically, he notes, accounts of the Arctic “enable us to compare and contrast, and so to appreciate the scale of what is happening in the far North.” With countries like Russia, Norway, Canada, and the United States jockeying for control over the potentially oil- and mineral-rich—and rapidly melting—Arctic Sea, it seems more urgent to understand how earlier territorial disputes were settled and how European and Euro-American encounters with indigenous peoples were handled. Less tangibly, but nonetheless significantly, deepening concern about the environment has spurred a “green consciousness” that has prompted new questioning of humankind’s relationship to nature. The conventional, often competing themes of the literature of polar exploration—of man against nature and man in nature; of man the conqueror of the wilderness and man its victim; of science as the instrument of knowledge and science as the veil covering human destructiveness and hubris—have found a new currency in our present, uncertain age. Since the early 19th century, tales of polar exploration have held a powerful grip on the public imagination, providing hours of vicarious thrills to domestically inclined listeners and readers eager for armchair adventures. English explorer John Franklin’s narrative of his 1819–1822 Arctic expedition was reprinted six times in England and appeared in French, German, and American editions as well. The American Elisha Kent Kane’s two-volume Arctic Explorations sold more than 150,000 copies in several editions after its initial publication in 1853. Robert F. Scott’s The Voyage of the Discovery (1905), Shackleton’s South! (1919), and Apsley Cherry-Garrard’s account of the disastrous Scott expedition, The Worst Journey in the World (1922), were widely read. Many of these now classic accounts are still in print. Although the number of high-profile expeditions to the polar regions fell off steeply after the First World War, the public appetite for such adventures among European and American audiences has remained strong. Even today, new biographies and reexaminations of famous...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorically speakingSame topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207