Prevention of Peptide Fibril Formation in an Aqueous Environment by Mutation of a Single Residue to Aib
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The behavior of a number of 16 residue polypeptides with a sequence Acetyl-EACARXZAACEAAARQ-amide, where X = V or A and Z = A or Aib, is studied under aqueous conditions. It is shown that the substitution of a single alanine residue by alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) completely alters both the conformation and the aggregation properties of the peptides. The Ala-Ala (X,Z = A,A) peptide is shown by circular dichroism and FTIR methods to adopt a predominately beta-sheet conformation. Furthermore, the peptide has limited solubility and is shown to form fibrils by electron microscopy and thioflavin T binding assays. In contrast, a single substitution at the center of peptide of alanine to Aib (X,Z = A,Aib) completely abolishes fibril formation and alters the conformation to a mixture of random coil and alpha-helix. The results show that Aib is a strong beta-sheet disrupter that is also able to adopt a helical conformation. This is linked to its role in peptaibol antibiotics. Aib provides an attractive alternative to proline and other substitutions in producing peptide variants with a lower tendency to produce fibril aggregates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".