MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020103256 · doi:10.3917/ds.343.0425

Stigmatisation du travail du sexe et identité des travailleurs et travailleuses du sexe

2010· article· fr· W2020103256 on OpenAlexaff
Jacqueline Comte

Bibliographic record

VenueDéviance et Société · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historiquement associée à l’immoralité et la criminalité, la prostitution est, encore aujourd’hui, l’objet de croisades morales qui en maintiennent la stigmatisation. Face à ce stigmate, les travailleurs et travailleuses du sexe vont soit le repousser aux autres, soit le remettre en question. Bien que la nature dégradante de cette activité soit posée comme étant due à une aliénation de la sexualité qui aliénerait l’identité et que des travaux de recherche en font un a priori, l’analyse des pratiques indique que ce ne serait pas le cas. Le lien existant entre sexualité et identité n’est pas inhérent, mais est le produit d’une construction sociale visant le contrôle de la sexualité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.022
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDéviance et SociétéSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207