MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020110325 · doi:10.1134/s0032945206050018

On the Gadus taxonomy: Ontogenetic evidence

2006· article· en· W2020110325 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ichthyology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish biology, ecology, and behavior
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGadusBiologyTaxonomy (biology)LarvaZoologyTaxonOntogenyEcologyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taxonomic comparisons of the early life history stages of Gadus species were conducted from new and published data on morphological descriptions of eggs and yolk-sac larvae. Findings suggest that G. ogac and G. macrocephalus , two genetically similar species, can be distinguished by differences in their larval pigment patterns, i.e., the position of postanal pigment bars. Differences in the egg chorion were also apparent between Gadus ogac and G. morhua marisalbi . The chorion of G. ogac is adhesive with weak striations, whereas, in G. morhua marisalbi , the chorion is nonadhesive and smooth. Collectively, these data provide supporting evidence towards the assertion that G. ogac, G. macrocephalus , and G. morhua marisalbi are all distinct taxa and can be distinguished at the first stages of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it