MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020118849 · doi:10.1063/1.3054865

The partition function of the two-matrix model as an isomonodromic τ function

2009· article· en· W2020118849 on OpenAlexafffund
Marco Bertola, Olivier Marchal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalConcordia University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsGeneralizationPartition function (quantum field theory)Ordinary differential equationPure mathematicsPartition (number theory)Matrix (chemical analysis)Monodromy matrixFunction (biology)Rational functionRamanujan tau functionMonodromyMathematical analysisDifferential equationApplied mathematicsCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the Itzykson–Zuber–Eynard–Mehta two-matrix model and prove that the partition function is an isomonodromic τ function in a sense that generalizes that of Jimbo et al. [ “Monodromy preserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients,” Physica D 2, 306 (1981)]. In order to achieve the generalization we need to define a notion of τ function for isomonodromic systems where the adregularity of the leading coefficient is not a necessary requirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207