Adenosine stimulation of proliferation of breast carcinoma cell lines: Evaluation of the [<sup>3</sup>H]thymidine assay system and modulatory effects of the cellular microenvironment in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purine nucleoside adenosine is produced at increased levels in the tissues of solid cancers as a result of local hypoxia. Adenosine inhibits the cell-mediated anti-tumor immune response, promotes tumor cell migration and angiogenesis, and stimulates the proliferation of tumor cells. We examined the stimulatory effect of adenosine on DNA synthesis, cell cycle progression, and cell proliferation in MCF7 and T-47D breast carcinoma cell lines in culture, and identified factors that modulate the growth response. The ability of adenosine to stimulate DNA synthesis, as measured by the incorporation of [(3)H]thymidine, was independent of the total radioactivity of the [(3)H]thymidine up to 10 microCi/ml, total thymidine concentrations up to 100 microM, and the labeling interval. It was also not affected by the presence of low-molecular-weight compounds (such as thymidine and adenosine) in the serum used to supplement the medium. Adenosine stimulated DNA synthesis and cell proliferation with an EC(50) of 4-6 microM and a maximum response at 30-100 microM, when given as a single addition. The stimulatory effect of adenosine involved progression through the cell cycle and a genuine increase in cell number, in the absence of significant apoptotic or necrotic cell death. The mitogenic effect of adenosine was dependent upon the culture cell density, with an optimum adenosine response at around 50% of confluent density. The response was also highly dependent upon the form of the serum addition to the growth medium, with the best response elicited in the presence of low concentrations of nonfetal bovine serum, although adenosine was mitogenic under standard culture conditions. The effects of serum supplementation and cell density were not due to differences in the rate of adenosine metabolism by either serum or cellular enzymes, but appeared to result from changes in the sensitivity to adenosine of the cell population in response to environmental cues. We, therefore, find that adenosine is consistently mitogenic for human breast carcinoma cells, and that the [(3)H]thymidine incorporation assay is a valid measure of this response. The data are consistent with the stimulatory effect of adenosine on cell proliferation being modulated by the local cellular environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".