MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020141922 · doi:10.1175/jas3658.1

Rayleigh Wave–Internal Wave Coupling and Internal Wave Generation above a Model Jet Stream

2006· article· en· W2020141922 on OpenAlexafffund
Bruce Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsInternal wavePhysicsMechanicsRayleigh waveRichardson numberMechanical waveWave propagationBuoyancyShear flowGravity waveBreaking waveLongitudinal waveWavenumberStratified flowsStratified flowTurbulenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Linear theory for modes in a nonuniformly stratified, semi-infinite shear flow demonstrates that Rayleigh waves (stable waves propagating in fluid with spatially varying shear) couple with evanescent internal waves. If the bulk Richardson number (the squared ratio of the buoyancy frequency and shear) lies between 1/4 and 1, the waves have infinite e-folding depth for waves with critical relative horizontal wavenumbers. Fully nonlinear numerical simulations examine the effect of Rayleigh wave–internal wave coupling when the shear layer is localized and is thus Kelvin–Helmholtz unstable. Diagnostics examining profiles of the wave-induced mean flow show that if the bulk Richardson number is of order unity, significant momentum is extracted from a shear layer as a consequence of transport by waves. The work is extended to the study of unstable jet flows and applications of this work for internal wave generation by dynamic instability of the upper flank of the jet stream are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Atmospheric SciencesSame topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207