MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020158602 · doi:10.1088/0953-2048/28/2/025012

Collapse of the magnetization by the application of crossed magnetic fields: observations in a commercial Bi:2223/Ag tape and comparison with numerical computations

2015· article· en· W2020158602 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSuperconductor Science and Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetizationComputationMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsMagnetic fieldMechanicsPhysicsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the effects of crossed magnetic fields on a commercial Bi:2223/Ag tape superconductor. The large magnetic moments which are generated in the specimen by the application or change of an external magnetic field (denoted H z ) directed perpendicularly to the plane of the tapes, hence along the c -axis of the crystallites, are considerably reduced in magnitude when subsequently a magnetic field (denoted H y ) directed along the plane of the tape, hence along the ab plane of the crystallites, is impressed and removed and made to undergo several half cycles of oscillations in the opposite direction. We find that a few cycles cause the magnetic moment to rapidly depart from the critical state major hysteresis envelope and reach asymptotically the reversible diamagnetic Meissner moment M rev , which is aligned in the out-of-plane direction of the tape ( c -axis). We observe that the application of crossed fields, first along the c -axis, then along the ab plane, effectively suppresses the bulk pinning magnetic moment, and quenches the associated persistent currents circulating in the ab plane. Our numerical computations, based on the finite element method and using an E – J power law to model the superconductor, can reproduce qualitatively the experimental data. In the numerical model, the current density flows perpendicularly to the plane within which the two components of the magnetic field vary. These investigations show that the observed decay in magnetization results from the complicated modification of current distribution due to the application of crossed magnetic fields within the sample cross section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it