MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020181805 · doi:10.1109/icc.2013.6654726

Robust wireless multihop localization using mobile anchors

2013· article· en· W2020181805 on OpenAlexafffund
Walid M. Ibrahim, Abd‐Elhamid M. Taha, Hossam S. Hassanein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceNode (physics)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksGlobal Positioning SystemKalman filterComputer networkSensor nodeScheme (mathematics)WirelessPosition (finance)Real-time computingMobile wireless sensor networkWireless networkEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowing the position of sensor nodes in an environmental monitoring is useful to identify the location of events. However deploying GPS receivers or other anchor sensors is expensive, since the role of anchor nodes ends after localizing sensor nodes' positions and they are transferred into ordinary sensor nodes. In this paper, we introduce a new localization scheme for a wireless sensor network that can localize sensor nodes using a collinear and non-collinear mobile anchor node. This scheme benefits from the estimated distance between neighbor nodes and additional information provided by the anchor node about the flow direction of the message. Each node localizes it's position from two independent directions. A Kalman Filter is then used to improve the location accuracy for each node. Through simulation studies, we show that the scheme using a Kalman Filter decreases the estimation errors than using single direction by 31% and 16% better than using weighted averages. As well, our new scheme overcomes the collinearity problem that appears from using mobile anchor nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207