Evolutionary analysis of <i>Pinus leiophylla</i>: a study using an Intron II sequence fragment of mitochondrial <i>nad1</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A phylogenetic analysis was done using a mitochondrial marker to study the relationship between Pinus leiophylla Schiede & Deppe and Californian, Mesoamerican, European, and Asian pines. The type II intron between the nad1 b and c exons was chosen for the analysis. Nineteen otus (15 species with mitotypes in two species) from the Pinus and Picea genera were used. Amplification using the two primers generated an approximately 1000 bp product, depending on species. Parsimony branch and bound analysis resulted in 135 shortest trees with 1323 steps (CI = 0.9131 and RI = 0.9511). The strict consensus tree showed P. leiophylla associated with Eurasian pines. Though unusual, it is not the first time this association has been proposed. Given these results, P. leiophylla is likely one of the oldest pine species in the Americas and probably arose from a Eurasian ancestor that initially invaded North America at between 25°N and 35°N latitude and later colonized Mexico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".