MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020239319 · doi:10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n2p413

New National Curriculum and the Impact in the Education Sector of Kosovo: Implications for Successful Implementation

2014· article· en· W2020239319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Educational and Social Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumChristian ministryService (business)StructuringProfessional developmentPedagogyCurriculum developmentResource (disambiguation)Teacher educationSociologyPolitical scienceMedical educationBusinessComputer scienceMedicineMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In August 2011, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) adopted a new national curriculum. Among other concepts, the Ministry committed to focus on learning outcomes, competencies, differentiated learning, and learner centered education in the new national curriculum. The impact of these changes rippled across the education sector requiring professional capacity building within the Ministry of Education, redesigning teacher pre-service preparation program, re-structuring teacher in-service program, innovating staff development and teacher mentoring for professional capacity building in schools, re-writing textbooks and creating supporting teacher resource materials. It was calculated that it would take ten years to implement fully these curriculum concepts. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the consequences of a Decision to create new national curriculum across the education sector and determine the best approach to implement it. DOI: 10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n2p413

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.562
Teacher spread0.454 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it