Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Penser le virtuel à travers les sciences sociales conduit à resituer le terme à partir de son étymologie qui ouvre un champ entre le réel et le possible. Il est une qualité qui incarne toujours la signification du passage du potentiel au réel, c’est donc un flux dynamique qui oscille entre les deux catégories ontologiques. Cette circulation peut s’intégrer dans une culture de la vie quotidienne et intervient alors comme médiation permanente entre la présence et l’absence, et fait culture. Le virtuel, dont la dimension numérique n’est qu’un aspect, est donc une dimension qui nous aide à penser la continuité et la puissance de ce qui existe par rituels et simulations. Il est l’indice de la valeur et de l’immatériel. Cette valeur peut être partagée socialement, un patrimoine commun immatériel, ou faite l’objet d’une évaluation concrète et économique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".