Effectiveness of Pamidronate for Treating Intractable Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of pamidronate for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain refractory to previous management. Intravenous pamidronate (60 mg/day for 3 days) was administered to 2 adolescents with neuropathic pain refractory to previous multidisciplinary treatments. Pain intensity, functional improvement, and adverse effects were evaluated. There were no significant reductions in pain intensity or improvements in function initially or at follow-up at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months. Minor side effects included myalgia and skeletal pain that were relieved by acetaminophen. There was no long-term morbidity. In contrast to recent positive reports in adults, pamidronate was not effective in decreasing pain or improving function in 2 adolescents with chronic neuropathic pain. Pamidronate may be effective only when pain is accompanied by abnormal bone density. Future trials should include scans to document bone density pretherapy and posttherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".