MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020284950 · doi:10.1109/pesmg.2013.6672786

Distribution network topology error correction using smart meter data analytics

2013· article· en· W2020284950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectricity Theft Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart meterNetwork topologyComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)MetreTransformerDistribution transformerData miningVoltageSmart gridReal-time computingElectrical engineeringComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an algorithm which was developed within BC Hydro with the purpose of detecting and correcting topology errors in existing GIS records of the distribution system. Starting with the distribution network topology information available in enterprise GIS, the proposed analytic approach uses smart meter data to detect wrongly connected customers in a transformer neighborhood based on the correlation factors and relative magnitude levels of hourly voltage profiles. Once a wrongly connected customer is identified, further analysis on correlation factors and relative voltage levels is done to correctly reposition this customer within the distribution network topology tree. Testing in a practical BC Hydro distribution system has achieved very encouraging results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectricity Theft Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207