Ridge gap waveguide to microstrip line transition with perforated substrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary form only given. The ridge gap waveguides is one of the highly recommended guided structures in high frequency applications. This is due to its ability to carry the signal with low losses. The signal pass through this structure in the form of Quasi TEM mode, which grantee less dispersion compared to other structures working in the same operating band with ridge gap waveguide, like SIW. One of the major drawbacks of the ridge gap waveguide is related to the used excitation technique. It is always difficult in fabrication and in many cases, it is responsible for limiting the possible bandwidth of the structure. One simple and straightforward idea is to connect the ridge gap waveguide to one of the standard 50Ω lines, such as Microstriop lines or Coplaner waveguides. This work is focused on the Microstrip line case. It is required that the ridge waveguide is directly connected with the 50Ω Microstrip line. The direct connection will have a certain level of mismatch and the reflection increases as the dielectric constant of the microstrip line substrate increases. As a first step of the transition design, a low relative permitivity substrate is chosen. This initially reduces the reflection occurs at the transition. The second step of the transition design is to insert two sections of matching between the microstrip line and the ridge gap waveguide with the help of lower dielectric constants substrates than those used in the microstrip line. The substrates with these lower dielectric constants can be achieved by using the same substrate and apply perforation. Controlling the perforation density will adjust the relative permitivity of the substrate at the required value to achieve matching. Using the previously described technique, the ridge gap waveguide can be attached directly to a 50Ω microstrip line. Connecting the microsrtip line to one of the standard coaxial connectors, like (SMA, 2.4mm, 3.5mm or 1.85mm), is a well-established connection. This provides a very easy procedure for ridge gap waveguide measurements. It is worth to mention that the fabrication process for such a transition is very simple as it is a two dimensions printed structure. To eliminate the radiation of this transition, an extension of the periodic cells is placed in the microstrip line side. Within the microstrip line part, the periodic cells will introduce some sort of packaging to get rid of leakage due to radiation. This extension also provides more smooth transition between the ridge gap waveguide and the microstrip line packaged with similar periodic structure. One important point that should be taken into consideration is that the substrate thickness of the microstrip line must be exactly the same as the gap height in the ridge gap structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".