MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy and Safety of Human Parathyroid Hormone-(1–84) in Increasing Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

2004· article· en· W2020339203 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony B. Hodsman, David A. Hanley, Mark P. Ettinger, Michael A. Bolognese, John Fox, Anna J. Metcalfe, Robert S. Lindsay

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBone mineralPlaceboOsteoporosisParathyroid hormoneInternal medicineVitamin D and neurologyUrologyEndocrinologyAnabolismLumbar spineBone remodelingCalciumSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many osteoporotic patients continue to have subnormal bone mineral density (BMD) despite treatment. Anabolic agents, including parathyroid hormone (PTH) and N-terminal fragment analogs of PTH, are able to induce large increases in bone mass and bone strength. This prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated 1 year of treatment with full-length recombinant human PTH (PTH-[1–84]) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. All participants were 50 to 75 years of age and had been postmenopausal for 5 years or longer. BMD in the lumbar spine was more than 2.5 standard deviations below the young adult mean. A total of 206 women were assigned to self-inject 50, 75, or 100 μg daily of human PTH-(1–84) or a placebo subcutaneously. All patients received calcium and vitamin D supplements. PTH treatment led to dose-related increases in BMD in the lumbar spine (Fig. 1). With the highest dose (100 μg daily), there was no tendency toward plateauing of the response. Average increases in BMD after 12 months were 3.0%, 5.1%, and 7.8%, respectively, for the 50-, 75-, and 100-μg doses. The 0.9% increase in BMD in placebo patients was not significantly greater than baseline BMD. There also was a treatment-related increase in bone area in the lumbar spine that was significant at the highest dose level. PTH treatment had a greater effect on bone mineral content than on BMD. The more severely osteoporotic women had the greatest responses to PTH treatment. Changes in BMD at the total hip and femoral neck were relatively small and inconsistent. Markers of bone remodeling such as osteocalcin were significantly increased in all PTH-treated groups after only 30 days of treatment. Serum calcium levels increased by a small but statistically significant degree in PTH-treated women. Compliance with self-injection exceeded 94% in all groups. Treatment was, in general, well tolerated. The dropout rate was 14%, noncompliance being the major cause. Only 1 patient, in the highest-dose group, withdrew because of repeated hypercalcemia. The most common adverse effect was a reaction at the injection site; it was not dose-related. Creatinine clearance tended to increase in all the PTH groups. Daily treatment with full-length PTH over 1 year led to a significant dose-related increase in lumbar spinal BMD in these postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The treatment appears to be safe.Fig. 1: Changes in bone mineral density, bone area, and bone mineral content in the lumbar spine (L1–L4) of postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with full-length parathyroid hormone or placebo for 1 year. Results are the mean ± standard error (n = 43–51/time point). *P <0.05 versus placebo. Reproduced with permission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5212–5220. Copyright © 2003, The Endocrine Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207