MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020342268 · doi:10.1021/ie000909q

Estimation of the Dynamic Matrix and Noise Model for Model Predictive Control Using Closed-Loop Data

2002· article· en· W2020342268 on OpenAlexaff
Ramesh Kadali, Biao Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspace topologyImpulse responseControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceModel predictive controlSystem identificationMatrix (chemical analysis)Noise (video)State-space representationEstimation theoryAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsData modelingArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dynamic matrix is a lower triangular matrix containing the step response coefficients of the deterministic input used in the model predictive control schemes such as the dynamic matrix controller. Subspace matrices (defined in subspace state-space identification methods) corresponding to the deterministic input and the stochastic input contain the impulse response coefficients of the deterministic and stochastic models, respectively. This paper proposes a new subspace identification based method for the estimation of the dynamic matrix of the deterministic input(s) directly from the closed-loop data. The noise model is simultaneously obtained from the closed-loop data in the impulse response form. The method is extendable to the case of measured disturbances. All of the results presented in this paper are applicable to the multivariate systems. Guidelines for the practical implementation of the algorithm are also presented in this paper. The proposed method is illustrated through MATLAB simulations and an application on a pilot-scale plant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207