MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020365268 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2014.905495

A nitrogen-responsive gene affects virulence in<i>Fusarium graminearum</i>

2014· article· en· W2020365268 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sean Walkowiak, Rajagopal Subramaniam

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirulenceFusariumBiologyGeneGene expressionMycotoxinFungusMicrobiologyNitrogenGeneticsBotanyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emerging models indicate that nitrogen availability is an important environmental cue for the induction of virulence in pathogenic fungi. This study explored gene expression patterns of the nitrogen-responsive gene FGSG_03881 and its role in virulence and toxin production in Fusarium graminearum. Using transcriptional fusion pFGSG_03881::GFP, we showed that FGSG_03881 exhibits differential expression profiles in 22 different nitrogen compounds. Since the growth patterns of the fungus also change under these conditions, a mathematical equation was derived to normalize the growth with the expression of FGSG_03881. We determined that expression of FGSG_03881 increased in the non-preferred sources of nitrogen, and decreased in the preferred nitrogen sources like glutamine. Additionally, we determined that this gene is neither linked to the biosynthesis of the mycotoxin DON nor regulated by the global regulator Tri6. Disruption of FGSG_03881 also resulted in increased infection and disease symptoms on wheat. Cumulatively, we suggest that FGSG_03881 is responsive to nitrogen availability and affects virulence in F. graminearum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207