Regards croisés Ontario-Québec : les services de soins de santé mentale des communautés de langue officielle en situation minoritaire de 1950 à nos jours
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considérant qu’un Canadien sur neuf hospitalisé pour maladie mentale retournera à l’urgence moins d’un mois après sa sortie d’hôpital, il importe de documenter, dans une perspective socio-historique, les itinéraires « transinstitutionnels » des personnes souffrant de troubles psychiques. Nous proposons ici une note de recherche sur l’enquête que nous menons sur l’évolution des services de soins de santé mentale des communautés de langue officielle en situation minoritaire, en particulier, les communautés francophones de l’Est et du Nord ontarien ainsi que de la communauté anglophone de l’Ouest du Québec. Ces regards croisés entre deux régions francophones de l’Ontario et le Montréal anglophone visent une meilleure compréhension de l’impact des facteurs de « langue de service » et de « culture » sur la santé mentale des communautés francophones en situation minoritaire (CFSM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".