Raman and transmission electron microscopy study of disordered silicon grown by molecular beam epitaxy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Silicon films were deposited by molecular beam epitaxy onto crystalline silicon (c-Si) and native oxide on c-Si (001) substrates at temperatures ranging from 98 to 572 °C. Raman spectroscopy of these films showed that both the short-range disorder and intermediate-range disorder decreases as the deposition temperature increases. The onset of a phase transition in the amorphous Si films can be effectively identified by the appearance of the polycrystalline and crystalline Si Raman bands, which allowed quantification of the crystalline volume fractions present. Both the transmission electron microscopy and Raman results confirmed that films grown on the amorphous substrates at temperatures less than 414 °C are entirely amorphous, but exhibit c-Si features at higher temperatures. Films grown on c-Si substrates exhibit a characteristic limiting thickness for epitaxy and the transformation of the resulting upper amorphous layer into crystalline form takes place at a much lower temperature (∼290 °C) than for the amorphous substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".