MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020431084 · doi:10.1002/lapl.200710091

Density functional theory of the trapped Fermi gas in the unitary regime

2007· article· en· W2020431084 on OpenAlexaff
Brandon P. van Zyl, D. A. W. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser Physics Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersMarsden Fund
KeywordsUnitary statePhysicsFermi gasDensity functional theoryFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeLimit (mathematics)Work (physics)Thomas–Fermi modelQuantum mechanicsEnergy (signal processing)Functional theoryStatistical physicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate a density-functional theory (DFT) approach for an unpolarized trapped dilute Fermi gas in the unitary limit. A reformulation of the recent work of T. Papenbrock [1] in the language of fractional exclusion statistics allows us to obtain an estimate of the universal factor, ξ3D, in three dimensions (3D), in addition to providing a systematic treatment of finite-N corrections. We show that in 3D, finite-N corrections lead to unphysical values for ξ3D, thereby suggesting that a simple DFT applied to a small number of particles may not be suitable in 3D. We then perform an analogous calculation for the two-dimensional (2D) system in the infinite-scattering length regime, and obtain a value of ξ2D=1. Owing to the unique properties of the Thomas-Fermi energy density-functional in 2D our result, in contrast to 3D, is exact and therefore requires no finite-N corrections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser Physics LettersSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207