MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020482403 · doi:10.1115/icone18-30024

Developing New Heat-Transfer Correlation for SuperCritical-Water Flow in Vertical Bare Tubes

2010· article· en· W2020482403 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 2 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluidHeat transferThermodynamicsHeat transfer coefficientExperimental dataMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Materials sciencePhysicsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an analysis of heat transfer in water at supercritical conditions in bare vertical tubes. A large dataset within conditions similar to those of SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactors (SCWRs) was obtained from the Institute for Physics and Power Engineering (Obninsk, Russia). This dataset was compared to existing heat-transfer correlations from the open literature. This comparison is an extension to the previous studies done with this dataset. Previous studies have shown that existing correlations, such as the Dittus-Boelter correlation significantly overestimates the experimental heat transfer coefficient (HTC) values within the pseudocritical range; the Bishop et al. and Jackson’s correlations were also found to deviate significantly from the experimental data. The Swenson et al. correlation provided a better fit for the experimental data, as compared to the previous three correlations within some flow conditions, but deviates from data for other conditions. HTC and wall temperature values calculated with the FLUENT CFD code also deviate from the experimental data within some conditions. After analyzing the existing correlations, it was decided to develop a better correlation for predicting HTC. Since the Swenson et al. correlation seems to be the best candidate for predicting the experimental data; it was selected as a basis for developing a new empirical correlation. The primary difference of the Swenson et al. approach is that it uses the majority of thermophysical properties at the wall temperature as opposed to those used at bulk-fluid temperatures in other models. Calculating various thermophysical properties based on wall temperature seems to give much better results in terms of accuracy. To obtain a basic empirical correlation, a dimensional analysis was conducted using a combination of various dimensionless terms. This approach was combined with the experimental dataset at the normal heat-transfer regime using statistical analysis. The final correlation showed the best fit for the experimental dataset within a wide range of flow conditions. The calculated wall temperatures were within (±15%) for the analyzed dataset, which is a considerable improvement from the previous correlations. The accuracy of calculated values was further improved when a term was added to the correlation that accounted for the entrance effect in bare tubes. Thus, the new correlation presented in this paper can be used for HTC calculations in supercritical-water heat exchangers at SCW Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in case of the indirect cycle, in heat exchangers for co-generation of hydrogen from supercritical water side, for a preliminary heat-transfer calculations in SCWR fuel channels as a conservative approach. It can also be used for future comparisons with other independent datasets, with bundled data, for the verification of computer codes for SCWR core thermalhydraulics and for the verification of scaling parameters between water and modeling fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it