MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020488675 · doi:10.1145/365723.365728

An observation on bisection software for the symmetric tridiagonal eigenvalue problem

2000· article· en· W2020488675 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Kaufman

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTridiagonal matrixBisectionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsBisection methodMathematicsComputationTridiagonal matrix algorithmMatrix (chemical analysis)Symmetric matrixApplied mathematicsYield (engineering)Reduction (mathematics)Minor (academic)Algebra over a fieldAlgorithmPure mathematicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we discuss a small modification of the bisection routines in EISPACK and LAPACK for finding a few of the eigenvalues of a symmetric tridiagonal matrix A . When the principal minors of the matrix A yield good approximations to the desired eigenvalues, these modifications can yield about 30% reduction in the computation times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.009
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Mathematical SoftwareSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207