MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020550022 · doi:10.3749/canmin.47.1.159

BURGESSITE, Co2 (H2O)4 [AsO3(OH)]2 (H2O), A NEW ARSENATE MINERAL SPECIES FROM THE KEELEY MINE, SOUTH LORRAIN TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO, CANADA

2009· article· en· W2020550022 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jiří Sejkora, F. C. Hawthorne, Mark A. Cooper, J. D. Grice, J. Vajdak, J. L. Jambor

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of NatureUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsArsenateMineralGeochemistryChemistryGeologyArsenic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Burgessite, Co 2 (H 2 O) 4 [AsO 3 (OH)] 2 (H 2 O), is a new mineral species of supergene origin from the Keeley mine, South Lorrain Township, Timiskaming District, Ontario, Canada. Burgessite forms rosettes up to 0.8 mm across consisting of prismatic crystals up to 0.1 mm long, elongate along a , with the following forms: {011} >> { h 0 l }, and no observable twinning. It is associated with primary skutterudite, cobaltite and bismuth, and supergene arsenolite, bismutoferrite and erythrite. Burgessite is transparent, purplish pink with a slight brown tint, and has a colorless to pale pink streak and a vitreous luster; it does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light. It exhibits two cleavages, {010} good and {001} fair. The Mohs hardness is ~3; burgessite is brittle with a hackly fracture, and has measured and calculated densities of 2.93(2) and 2.94 g/cm 3 , respectively. Burgessite is biaxial positive with α 1.596, β 1.604, γ 1.628, all ±0.002, with a 2 V obs of 70(2)° and 2 V calc = 61°. It is nonpleochroic, with an optic orientation X = b , Y ∧ c = 29° (in β obtuse), Z ∧ a = 20° (in β acute). Burgessite is monoclinic, space group P 2 1 /n , a 4.7058(12), b 9.299(3), c 12.738(4) A, β 98.933(8)°, V 550.6(5) A 3 , Z = 2, a:b:c = 0.5061:1:1.3698. The strongest seven lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern [ d in A(I)( hkl )] are: 7.446(100)(011), 6.267(44)(002), 3.725(29)(022), 3.260(25)(121), 2.998(31)(031), 2.970(21)(014) and 2.596(23)(024). A chemical analysis with an electron microprobe gave As 2 O 5 47.91, P 2 O 5 0.03, CoO 27.31, NiO 3.52, ZnO 0.04, CaO 0.18, SO 3 0.13, H 2 O (calc.) 22.65, for a sum of 101.77 wt.%; the valence states of As and Co, and the amount of H 2 O, were determined by crystal-structure analysis. The resulting empirical formula on the basis of 13 (O, OH, H 2 O) anions is (Co 1.75 Ni 0.23 Ca 0.02 ) ∑2.00 (AsO 3 OH) ∑2.00 (H 2 O) 5 . The crystal structure of burgessite consists of chains of the form [Co 2 (H 2 O) 4 (As 5+ O 3 (OH)) 2 ] that extend in the a direction and are linked by hydrogen bonds, and is closely related to that of erythrite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207