Infección por virus de inmunodeficiencia humana en el embarazo: Tratamiento anti-retroviral y vía de parto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
utilización de terapia anti-retroviral en madres infectadas con VIH reduce la transmisión perinatal del virus 1 .A partir de esa fecha numerosas publicaciones han confirmado este hallazgo y han ensayado diversos esquemas en relación a la duración durante el embarazo, parto y primeras semanas de vida del recién nacido, así como variadas combinaciones de anti-retrovirales (con uno, dos o tres fármacos).Con ello ha aumentado el número de mujeres expuestas a diversas anti-retrovirales, en los diferentes trimestres de embarazo.Se ha ido acumulando información en relación a los beneficios de la terapia antiretroviral (TAR), IntroducciónEl embarazo otorga una oportunidad única de pesquisa, en población asintomática, de la infección por VIH.Para ello es necesario ofrecerle a toda paciente, en su primer control prenatal (con una adecuada consejería pre y post-test) la realización del examen de tamizaje.Sólo así se podrán poner en práctica las diversas estrategias para reducir la tasa de transmisión perinatal (TPN) del virus, que se analizarán en este artículo.Si la pesquisa es insuficiente la reducción de dicha transmisión será siempre limitada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".