MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020607532 · doi:10.1179/026708404225010630

Electrodeposition of Composite Ceria-Polyethylenimine Films

2004· article· en· W2020607532 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyethylenimineMaterials scienceThermogravimetric analysisElectrophoretic depositionIntercalation (chemistry)GraphiteComposite numberChemical engineeringDeposition (geology)ElectrolyteElectrochemistryNanocompositePolymerCationic polymerizationInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyComposite materialPolymer chemistryElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A combined electrophoretic-electrolytic deposition method was applied to the fabrication of composite organic-inorganic films. Composite films consisting of ceria and polyethylenimine (PEI) were obtained via cathodic electrodeposition on Ni, Pt, graphite and carbon felt substrates. By varying the concentration of PEI in solutions and the deposition time, the amount of deposited material and its composition could be controlled. The deposits were studied by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and SEM. A mechanism of electrochemical intercalation of the cationic polymer into ceria deposits is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it