MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020667275 · doi:10.1139/p01-045

Damage profile and mode observation in LiTaO<sub>3</sub> by low-energy H<sup>+</sup> ions

2001· article· en· W2020667275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsIonAtomic physicsTrimAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LiTaO 3 samples were implanted with 50, 80, 120, and 150 keV H + ions. The damage profiles in LiTaO 3 induced by H + ions were investigated using the Rutherford backscattering/channeling technique. We used TRIM (transport of ions in matter) to simulate it. It was found that the shape of the experimental damage profile was similar to one predicted by TRIM'98, but the experimental damage ratio (N D N) was higher than the calculated damage ratio based on TRIM'98. The modes in LiTaO 3 were measured by a prism-coupling method for all samples. The modes were observed only for LiTaO 3 implanted with 80, 120, and 150 keV H + ions. The present result shows that optical wave guides in LiTaO 3 can be formed by lower energy H + ions. PACS Nos.: 61.72-y, 61.82-d, 61.85+p, 78.20Ci

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it