PERFORMANCES OF CONCRETE-FILLED GFRP OR GFRP-STEEL CIRCULAR TUBES SUBJECTED TO FREEZE-THAW CYCLES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the performances of concrete-filled glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and GFRP externally wound steel circular tubes, subjected to freeze-thaw cycles ranging from -18°C to 18°C. The variation in hoop strains of the tubes during the freeze-thaw cycles was monitored by embedded fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) strain sensors in GFRP layers or between GFRP and steel tube. The residual hoop strain after each freeze-thaw cycle indicates the possible degradation of GFRP materials, such as cracks, debonding of GFRP-concrete or GFRP-steel due to mismatch of the coefficient of thermal expansion, as well as water immersion. A synergistic effect of FRP and steel tubes on the confinement of inside concrete was revealed, resulting in well-improved ductility. After 56 freeze-thaw cycles, remarkable degradation were found in the axial strength, modulus, and strain for concrete-filled GFRP tubes. However, the GFRP-steel tube system showed a negligible reduction in the ultimate axial strain by the freeze-thaw cycles with less degradation in the axial strength and modulus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".