Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many children who suffer significant atopic eczema at a very young age experience a marked improvement of symptoms as they leave infancy behind. By the time they reach puberty, around three quarters of these children are symptom-free. However, the remaining quarter have a chronic visible condition with treatments that may seem onerous and at times useless to the average teenage sufferer. Conversely, puberty is a common time for psoriasis to present, at a stage of life when many seem poorly equipped to cope. So how should health professionals temper their approach to this client group, who have needs that are distinct from those of the young child and the adult patient? There is no doubt that self-esteem takes a huge battering when an individual is coping with a visible skin condition: puberty only serves to magnify this. In a qualitative research study of patients with psoriasis, Ginsburg and Link (1989) identified key areas creating stigmatization. It is interesting that a number of these have resonance with feelings often found in pubescent children, including anticipation of rejection; feelings of being flawed; sensitivity to the opinions of others; and secretiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".